Conventional grip-strength measurement
A dynamometer gives a force reading, often summarized as the peak. That answers how hard someone squeezed during the test.
Exploring spatial pressure sensing, movement tracking, and interactive measurement technologies for research and future applications.
Investigational research prototype for controlled measurement studies.
Two grips can produce the same peak strength while placing pressure in different areas. During a task such as picking up and placing an object, the grip can also change as the object moves.
A dynamometer gives a force reading, often summarized as the peak. That answers how hard someone squeezed during the test.
GripTrak 3D explores where contact occurs, how the sensor response changes over time, and how the object moves during a controlled task.
Change the pattern and intensity to see how spatial contact appears on a heatmap. The default pattern shows four finger contacts on one side and an offset thumb on the other. The contact locations stay fixed as simulated pressure rises and falls.
The cylinder streams sensor readings to a workstation. A separate camera workflow uses video to estimate where the cylinder moves.
A flexible 32 × 64 grid responds to contact on the cylinder.
The embedded controller scans the grid and reads inertial signals.
A gateway forwards the sensor data over Wi-Fi.
The workstation reconstructs pressure frames and can record sessions for replay.
The viewer maps relative sensor readings to colour.
The viewer displays orientation. A separate camera workflow estimates the tagged cylinder’s trajectory.
A flexible 32 × 64 matrix samples contact across the cylindrical gripping surface. The heatmap shows relative sensor response in ADC counts.
Gyroscope, accelerometer and magnetometer streams support inspection of motion and visualization of device orientation.
The Python tools reconstruct pressure frames, plot inertial channels and support recording and replay for analysis.
The 32 × 64 grid shows where contact changes across the grip. Heatmap values are relative sensor response in ADC counts. Force in newtons would require calibration.
Gyroscope, accelerometer and magnetometer traces describe angular motion, acceleration and magnetic field. The viewer uses inertial signals to visualize orientation.
A calibrated camera and AprilTag yield per-frame position and orientation estimates. A sequence of estimates describes the object’s trajectory when the marker is visible.
Research directions build on the current handheld prototype. Future opportunities would require different sensing surfaces, integration and validation.
Map changes in spatial contact during a grasp.
Potential value · Compare where and when grip patterns change.
Explore grip patterns during controlled research tasks.
Potential value · Develop candidate measurements for approved studies.
Capture pressure and camera pose during object placement.
Potential value · Investigate how contact changes while an object moves.
Explore sensing surfaces as an input channel.
Potential value · Compare pressure gestures and feedback designs.
Explore press, hold and release as game inputs.
Potential value · Study whether intentional finger inputs can be distinguished.
Investigate contact distribution on handheld objects.
Potential value · Compare alternative handles in controlled tasks.
Adapt a sensing layer to a foot-contact surface.
Potential value · Explore loading patterns across a step.
Explore pressure across a seated contact surface.
Potential value · Compare load distribution across cushion designs.
Adapt spatial sensing to gripper fingers.
Potential value · Observe contact during grasp experiments.
Explore conformal sensing at a socket interface.
Potential value · Compare contact locations in fit experiments.
Explore pressure sensing on handles and implements.
Potential value · Compare grip patterns across techniques.
Explore sensing on tool handles and contact surfaces.
Potential value · Measure how load is distributed during a task.
A controlled object-placement task lets researchers compare grip changes as a person grasps, carries and releases the cylinder.
Flexible sensor sheets and an earlier controller documented in bench photos.
Fabricated PCB, printed enclosure and spatial acquisition software.
Tagged object-placement recordings and camera annotation output.
Evaluate timing, repeatability and finger-specific interaction.
Project photos, CAD, software screenshots and one labeled concept illustration. Select an image to enlarge it.
See the research viewer’s pressure heatmap, inertial plots, and orientation display.
Watch on YouTube ↗Local clip · Recorded AprilTag trial with an estimated pose overlay. Use the YouTube link for the full viewer demo.
We welcome discussions with university labs, rehabilitation researchers, biomedical and robotics engineers, industry R&D teams, and potential funding or commercialization partners.
Discuss task design, repeatability studies, sensor calibration, or comparison with a reference camera or instrument.
URNeuroLab contact page ↗Discuss a scoped sensing, firmware, or visualization experiment and the evidence needed to evaluate it.
Maruf Ahmad, SaskTech Lab